Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 64(11): e763-e768, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2121788

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the association between the perceived adequacy of infection control practices (ICPs) and symptoms of anxiety among educators in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Data from 4947 educators were collected in December 2020. Modified Poisson models assessed the association between adequacy of ICPs and moderate or severe anxiety symptoms, adjusting for a range of covariates. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of respondents reported moderate or severe anxiety symptoms. Two-thirds (66.5%) of the sample had less than half of their ICP needs met. Respondents with less than half their ICP needs met were more than three times more likely to have moderate or severe anxiety, compared with respondents with their ICP needs met. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the importance of adequate administrative and engineering controls in schools, not only to minimize risk of infection, but also for educator's mental health.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders , Anxiety , Humans , Ontario/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Schools , Infection Control
2.
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry / La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie ; 66(1):17-24, 2021.
Article in English | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-1801691

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To examine the relationship between perceived adequacy of personal protective equipment (PPE) and workplace-based infection control procedures (ICP) and mental health symptoms among a sample of health-care workers in Canada within the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A convenience-based internet survey of health-care workers in Canada was facilitated through various labor organizations between April 7 and May 13, 2020. A total of 7,298 respondents started the survey, of which 5,988 reported information on the main exposures and outcomes. Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) screener, and depression symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) screener. We assessed the perceived need and adequacy of 8 types of PPE and 10 different ICP. Regression analyses examined the proportion of GAD-2 and PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher across levels of PPE and ICP, adjusted for a range of demographic, occupation, workplace, and COVID-19-specific measures. Results: A total of 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.5% to 56.1%) of the sample had GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher, and 42.3% (95% CI, 41.0% to 43.6%) of the sample had PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher. Absolute differences of 18% (95% CI, 12% to 23%) and 17% (95% CI, 12% to 22%) were observed in the prevalence of GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher between workers whose perceived PPE needs and ICP needs were met compared to those who needs were not met. Differences of between 11% (95% CI, 6% to 17%) and 19% (95% CI, 14% to 24%) were observed in PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher across these same PPE and ICP categories. Conclusions: Our results suggest strengthening employer-based infection control strategies likely has important implications for the mental health symptoms among health-care workers in Canada. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (French) Objectifs: Examiner la relation entre le caractere adequat percu de l'equipement de protection personnel (EPP) et les procedures de controle des infections (PCI) en milieu de travail et les symptomes de sante mentale au sein d'un echantillon de travailleurs de la sante du Canada, dans le contexte de la pandemie COVID-19 en cours. Methodes: Un sondage de commodite sur Internet des travailleurs de la sante du Canada auquel ont collabore diverses organisations professionnelles entre le 7 avril et le 13 mai 2020. En tout, 7 298 repondants ont commence le sondage, et 5 988 d'entre eux ont donne de l'information sur les expositions principales et les resultats. Les symptomes anxieux etaient evalues a l'aide du depisteur du trouble d'anxiete generalisee (GAD-2), et les symptomes de depression, a l'aide du questionnaire sur la sante du patient (PHQ-2). Nous avons evalue le besoin et le caractere adequat percus de 8 types d'EPP, et de 10 PCI differentes. Des analyses de regression ont examine la proportion des scores au GAD-2 et au PHQ-2 de 3 et plus eleves pour les niveaux d'EPP et de PCI, ajustes pour une serie de donnees demographiques, d'occupations, de milieux de travail, et de mesures specifiques pour la COVID-19. Resultats: Un total de 54,8% (intervalle de confiance a 95% 53,5% a 56,1%) de l'echantillon avait des scores au GAD-2 de trois et plus, et 42,3% (IC a 95% 41,0% a 43,6%) de l'echantillon avait des scores au PHQ-2 de trois et plus. Des differences absolues de 18% (IC a 95% 12% a 23%) et de 17% (IC a 95% 12% a 22%) ont ete observees dans la prevalence des scores au GAD-2 de trois et plus entre les travailleurs qui percevaient que leurs besoins d'EPP et de PCI etaient combles, compare a ceux dont les besoins n'etaient pas combles. Des differences entre 11% (IC a 95% 6% a 17%) et 19% (IC a 95% 14% a 24%) ont ete observees dans les scores au PHQ-2 de trois et plus dans les memes categories d'EPP et de PCI. Conclusions: Nos resultats suggerent qu'un resserrement des strategies de controle des infections par l'employeur a probablement des implications importantes pour les symptomes de sante mentale chez les travailleurs de la sante du Canada. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

3.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(6): 361-364, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1702769

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted productivity of female academics in the field of occupational and environmental health, by examining trends in male and female authorship of submissions during and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic in Occupational and Environmental Medicine. METHODS: Administrative data on submissions between January 2017 and November 2021 were obtained through databases held at BMJ journals. Author gender was identified using an existing algorithm based on matching names to social media accounts. The number and proportion of female and male primary (first) and senior (last) authors were examined for each quarter, and the average change in share of monthly submissions from male authors in the months since the pandemic compared with corresponding months prior to the pandemic were identified using regression models estimating least squares means. RESULTS: Among 2286 (64.7%) and 2335 (66.1%) manuscripts for which first and last author gender were identified, respectively, 49.3% of prepandemic submissions were from male first authors, increasing to 55.4% in the first year of the pandemic (difference of 6.1%, 95% CI 1.3% to 10.7%), before dropping to 46.6% from April 2021 onwards. Quarterly counts identified a large increase in submissions from male authors during the first year after the onset of the pandemic, and a smaller increase from female authors. The proportion of male last authors did not change significantly during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that there has been an increase in male productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic within the field of occupational and environmental health research that is present to a lesser extent among women.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Environmental Medicine , Authorship , Bibliometrics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Sex Factors
4.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(6): 403-411, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1622075

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to estimate the rate of workplace outbreak-associated cases of COVID-19 by industry in labour market participants aged 15-69 years who reported working the majority of hours outside the home in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of COVID-19 workplace outbreaks and associated cases reported in Ontario between 1 April 2020 and 31 March 2021. All outbreaks were manually classified into two-digit North American Industry Classification System codes. We obtained monthly denominator estimates from the Statistics Canada Labour Force Survey to estimate the incidence of outbreak-associated cases per 100 000 000 hours among individuals who reported the majority of hours were worked outside the home. We performed this analysis across industries and in three distinct time periods. RESULTS: Overall, 12% of cases were attributed to workplace outbreaks among working-age adults across our study period. While incidence varied across the time periods, the five industries with the highest incidence rates across our study period were agriculture, healthcare and social assistance, food manufacturing, educational services, and transportation and warehousing. CONCLUSIONS: Certain industries have consistently increased the incidence of COVID-19 over the course of the pandemic. These results may assist in ongoing efforts to reduce transmission of COVID-19 by prioritising resources, as well as industry-specific guidance, vaccination and public health messaging.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Incidence , Ontario/epidemiology
5.
Health Rep ; 32(11): 16-27, 2021 11 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1524859

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are important information gaps concerning the prevalence and distribution of infection control practices (ICPs) within workplaces continuing to operate during the COVID-19 pandemic. DATA AND METHODS: To address these gaps, this paper examines the prevalence of workplace ICPs among employed respondents to Statistics Canada's Labour Force Survey in the months of July, August and September 2020 (n = 53,316). The article also seeks to identify sociodemographic, occupational and workplace factors associated with the level and type of workplace ICPs. ICPs included the reorganization of the workplace to allow for physical distancing, increased access to hand sanitizer or handwashing facilities, enhanced cleaning protocols and access to personal protective equipment. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the number of ICPs in place and the absence of specific ICPs. RESULTS: Generally high levels of reported protections among workers (15% of the sample had three ICPs and 72% had four or more ICPs) were observed. However, certain subgroups of workers were less likely to have ICPs in place. These included workers who were male; those with lower levels of education, shorter job tenure, or non-permanent work; and those working in the agricultural, construction, transportation and warehousing, and education industries. INTERPRETATION: In a large sample of Canadian employees, generally high levels of workplace ICPs to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 were observed. Groups with lower levels of ICPs included workers at the start of their employment, workers with low levels of education, and certain industry groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Workplace , Canada/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control , Male , Pandemics , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Can J Psychiatry ; 66(1): 17-24, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1072892

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between perceived adequacy of personal protective equipment (PPE) and workplace-based infection control procedures (ICP) and mental health symptoms among a sample of health-care workers in Canada within the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A convenience-based internet survey of health-care workers in Canada was facilitated through various labor organizations between April 7 and May 13, 2020. A total of 7,298 respondents started the survey, of which 5,988 reported information on the main exposures and outcomes. Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) screener, and depression symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) screener. We assessed the perceived need and adequacy of 8 types of PPE and 10 different ICP. Regression analyses examined the proportion of GAD-2 and PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher across levels of PPE and ICP, adjusted for a range of demographic, occupation, workplace, and COVID-19-specific measures. RESULTS: A total of 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.5% to 56.1%) of the sample had GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher, and 42.3% (95% CI, 41.0% to 43.6%) of the sample had PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher. Absolute differences of 18% (95% CI, 12% to 23%) and 17% (95% CI, 12% to 22%) were observed in the prevalence of GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher between workers whose perceived PPE needs and ICP needs were met compared to those who needs were not met. Differences of between 11% (95% CI, 6% to 17%) and 19% (95% CI, 14% to 24%) were observed in PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher across these same PPE and ICP categories. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest strengthening employer-based infection control strategies likely has important implications for the mental health symptoms among health-care workers in Canada.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Depression/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Infection Control/standards , Occupational Health , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Age Factors , Anxiety/epidemiology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Canada/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Masks/supply & distribution , N95 Respirators/supply & distribution , Patient Health Questionnaire , Perception , Respiratory Protective Devices/supply & distribution , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors , Surgical Attire/supply & distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 65(3): 266-276, 2021 04 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-975202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to large proportions of the labour market moving to remote work, while others have become unemployed. Those still at their physical workplace likely face increased risk of infection, compared to other workers. The objective of this paper is to understand the relationship between working arrangements, infection control programs (ICP), and symptoms of anxiety and depression among Canadian workers, not specifically working in healthcare. METHODS: A convenience-based internet survey of Canadian non-healthcare workers was facilitated through various labour organizations between April 26 and June 6, 2020. A total of 5180 respondents started the survey, of which 3779 were assessed as employed in a full-time or part-time capacity on 2 March 2020 (prior to large-scale COVID-19 pandemic responses in Canada). Of this sample, 3305 (87.5%) had complete information on main exposures and outcomes. Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder screener (GAD-2), and depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire screener (PHQ-2). For workers at their physical workplace (site-based workers) we asked questions about the adequacy and implementation of 11 different types of ICP, and the adequacy and supply of eight different types of personal protective equipment (PPE). Respondents were classified as either: working remotely; site-based workers with 100% of their ICP/PPE needs met; site-based workers with 50-99% of ICP/PPE needs met; site-based workers with 1-49% of ICP/PPE needs met; site-based workers with none of ICP/PPE needs met; or no longer employed. Regression analyses examined the association between working arrangements and ICP/PPE adequacy and having GAD-2 and PHQ-2 scores of three and higher (a common screening point in both scales). Models were adjusted for a range of demographic, occupation, workplace, and COVID-19-specific factors. RESULTS: A total of 42.3% (95% CI: 40.6-44.0%) of the sample had GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher, and 34.6% (95% CI: 32.-36.2%) had PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher. In initial analyses, symptoms of anxiety and depression were lowest among those working remotely (35.4 and 27.5%), compared to site-based workers (43.5 and 34.7%) and those who had lost their jobs (44.1 and 35.9%). When adequacy of ICP and PPE was taken into account, the lowest prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms was observed among site-based workers with all of their ICP needs being met (29.8% prevalence for GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher, and 23.0% prevalence for PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher), while the highest prevalence was observed among site-based workers with none of their ICP needs being met (52.3% for GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher, and 45.8% for PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the adequate design and implementation of employer-based ICP have implications for the mental health of site-based workers. As economies re-open the ongoing assessment of ICP and associated mental health outcomes among the workforce is warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Exposure , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel , Humans , Infection Control , Mental Health , Occupations , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Workplace
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL